School questions on the November 3, 2026 ballot in Minnesota

83 school questions in 63 Minnesota school districts are listed for November 3, 2026 in the Minnesota Secretary of State ballot-question list. What this list covers: Every question the Secretary of State’s list labels a school district question. The list repeats a district’s question under each county the district spans; each question is shown once. A question is joined to its district by the district number in the list’s label, and only where the question’s own text names that district. The list’s one statewide question, a proposed constitutional amendment titled “Increasing funding to school districts”, is not a school district’s question: it is not counted among the questions here and is shown separately at the end of the page, with its official title and text. Source: the Minnesota Secretary of State ballot-question list, published by the Minnesota Secretary of State, retrieved October 5, 2026. It is the Secretary of State’s list of ballot questions for the November 3, 2026 State General Election, as posted in the state’s election results system before the election. It is not a certified ballot and not a result: a question withdrawn, corrected or added after the list was saved is not reflected here. About the amounts. The Secretary of State’s list has no amount column, and no amount is read from a question’s text, so no question has a headline figure. Any dollar amount, rate or number of years is in the question’s own text, which is shown in full. This page does not compute what any question would add to a tax bill. Each question is shown with the title and the full text the Secretary of State’s list shows. The list has no type column: the type shown is assigned by DistrictFacts from the question’s own title and text, by a fixed rule, and is not the Secretary of State’s. No result is published here until official results are published after the vote. This page does not say how to vote.

Albany Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #745): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Operating Levy. Question text: The board of Independent School District No. 745 (Albany), Minnesota has proposedto increase the School District’s general education revenue by $1,147 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten (10) years, beginning with taxes payable in 2027, and would increase each year by the rate of inflation. Shall the increase in the revenue proposed by the board of Independent School District No. 745 (Albany), Minnesota be approved? BY VOTING “YES” ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE PASSAGE OF THIS REFERENDUM WILL RESULT IN AN INCREASE IN YOUR PROPERTY TAXES For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $6,314,758.52 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $14,528 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 1,729 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Alden-Conger Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #242): General obligation bonds

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Bond Issue. Question text: Shall the school board of Independent School District No. 242 (Alden-Conger Public School) be authorized to issue its general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $1,250,000 to provide funds for the refunding of the District's Certificates of Participation, Series 2015A? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $2,122,377.88 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $17,128 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 482 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Alden-Conger Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #242): Capital project levy

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of Capital Project Levy Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 242 (Alden-Conger Public School) has also proposed a capital project levy authorization of 0.9106% times the net tax capacity of the school district. The additional revenue from the proposed authorization will be used to provide funds for the acquisition and maintenance of software, technology, and technology systems, and to pay the costs of technology-related personnel and training; and the acquisition of curriculum, textbooks, and materials. The proposed capital project levy authorization will raise approximately $50,000 for taxes payable in 2027, the first year it is to be levied, and would be authorized for ten years. The estimated total cost of the projects to be funded over that time period is approximately $500,000. Shall the capital project levy authorization proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 242 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $2,122,377.88 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $17,128 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 482 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Alexandria Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #206): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Revoking Existing Referendum Revenue Authorization; Approving New Authorization. Question text: The board of Independent School District No. 206 (Alexandria), Minnesota has proposed to revoke the School District's existing referendum revenue authorization of $595 per pupil and to replace that authorization with a new authorization of $2,225 per pupil, subject to an annual increase at the rate of inflation. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be first levied in 2026 for taxes payable in 2027 and applicable for ten (10) years unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the revocation of the existing referendum authorization and the approval of the new authorization proposed by the board of Independent School District No. 206 (Alexandria), Minnesota be approved? For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $17,828,939.77 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $15,475 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 3,951 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Austin Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #492): General obligation bonds

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School Building Bonds. Question text: Shall the board of Independent School District No. 492 (Austin), Minnesota be authorized to issue general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $24,900,000 for acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities, including but not limited to safety, security, and accessibility improvements, building capital maintenance and infrastructure, classroom improvements and renovation, and pool improvements and renovations? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $11,546,212.28 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $16,484 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 5,160 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Benson Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #777): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Revoking Existing Referendum Revenue Authorization; Approving New Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 777 (Benson Public Schools) has proposed to revoke the school district's existing referendum revenue authorization of $710.70 per pupil and to replace that authorization with a new authorization of $1,410.70 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years commencing with taxes payable in 2027 and increase each year by the rate of inflation beginning with taxes payable in 2028, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the school district's existing referendum revenue authorization be revoked, and the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 777 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $4,178,347.76 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $17,204 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 760 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Brainerd Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #181): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of New School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 181 (Brainerd Public Schools) has proposed to increase its general education revenue by $865 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years beginning with taxes payable in 2027, and increase each year by the rate of inflation beginning with taxes payable in 2028, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 181 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $29,644,254.90 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $16,479 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 5,915 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Caledonia Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #299): General obligation bonds

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Bond Issue. Question text: Shall the school board of Independent School District No. 299 (Caledonia Area Public Schools) be authorized to issue its general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $9,700,000 to provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities, including safety and security improvements at school sites and facilities; the construction of roof replacements and repairs; the construction and installation of mechanical and HVAC improvements; the renovation, remodeling and upgrading of restrooms; the removal and replacement of flooring; and the construction of a storage building and press box? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $2,511,818.19 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $15,717 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 688 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Caledonia Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #299): General obligation bonds

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Bond Issue. Question text: If School District Question 1 is approved, shall the school board of Independent School District No. 299 (Caledonia Area Public Schools) also be authorized to issue its general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $3,000,000 to provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities, including the construction and equipping of new career and technical education (CTE) and science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) spaces at the Middle School/HighSchool? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $2,511,818.19 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $15,717 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 688 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Campbell-Tintah Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #852): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Revoking Existing Referendum Revenue Authorizations; Approving New Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 852 (Campbell-Tintah) has proposed to revoke the school district's existing referendum revenue authorizations of $1,283.17 per pupil and $1,045.89 per pupil and to replace those authorizations with a new authorization of $5,229.06 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years commencing with taxes payable in 2027, and increase each year by the rate of inflation beginning with taxes payable in 2028, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the school district's existing referendum revenue authorizations be revoked, and the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 852 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $585,869.73 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $24,889 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 119 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Campbell-Tintah Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #852): Capital project levy

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of Capital Project Levy Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 852 (Campbell-Tintah) has also proposed a capital project levy authorization of .78692% times the net tax capacity of the school district. The additional revenue from the proposed authorization will be used to provide funds for deferred maintenance projects; facility infrastructure improvements; safety and security enhancements; technology and related technology support, maintenance, personnel, and training; transportation-related vehicles; instructional materials; utility service costs; and other operating capital revenue purposes. The proposed capital project levy authorization will raise approximately $100,000 for taxes payable in 2027, the first year it is to be levied, and would be authorized for ten years. The estimated total cost of the projects to be funded over that time period is approximately $1,000,000. If School District Question 1 is approved, shall the capital project levy authorization proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 852 also be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $585,869.73 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $24,889 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 119 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Centennial Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #12): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of New School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The board of Independent School District No. 12 (Centennial), Minnesota has proposed to increase the School District’s general education revenue by $375 per pupil, subject to an annual increase at the rate of inflation. The proposed new referendum revenue authorization would be first levied in 2026 for taxes payable in 2027 and applicable for ten (10) years unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the new referendum revenue authorization proposed by the board of Independent School District No. 12 (Centennial), Minnesota be approved? BY VOTING “YES” ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $29,661,968.12 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $15,713 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 6,842 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Centennial Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #12): General obligation bonds

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School Building Bonds. Question text: Shall the board of Independent School District No. 12 (Centennial), Minnesota be authorized to issue general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $108,890,000 for acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities including, but not limited to, safety and security improvements, additions/updates to facilities and academic spaces, and various other capital projects? BY VOTING “YES” ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $29,661,968.12 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $15,713 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 6,842 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Columbia Heights Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #13): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of New School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The board of Independent School District No. 13 (Columbia Heights Public Schools), Minnesota has proposed to increase the School District’s referendum revenue by $550 per pupil, subject to an annual increase at the rate of inflation beginning with taxes payable in 2028. The proposed new referendum revenue authorization would be first levied in 2026 for taxes payable in 2027 and applicable for ten (10) years unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the new referendum authorization proposed by the board of Independent School District No. 13 (Columbia Heights Public Schools), Minnesota, be approved? BY VOTING “YES” ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $15,640,902.87 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $16,181 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 3,449 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Dawson-Boyd Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #378): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Revoking Existing Referendum Revenue Authorization; Approving New Authorization. Question text: To vote for a question, fill in the oval next to the word “Yes” on that question. To vote against a question, fill in the oval next to the word “No” on that question. The board of Independent School District No. 378 (Dawson-Boyd), Minnesota has proposed to revoke the School District's existing referendum revenue authorization of $460 per pupil and to replace that authorization with a new authorization of $1,300 per pupil, subject to an annual increase at the rate of inflation. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be first levied in 2026 for taxes payable in 2027 and applicable for ten (10) years unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the revocation of the existing referendum authorization and the approval of the new authorization proposed by the board of Independent School District No. 378 (Dawson­-Boyd), Minnesota be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $3,136,819.68 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $15,251 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 593 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Dilworth-Glyndon-Felton, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2164): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 2164 (Dilworth-Glyndon-Felton) has proposed to increase its general education revenue by $500 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years beginning with taxes payable in 2027, and increase each year by the rate of inflation beginning with taxes payable in 2028, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 2164 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $5,130,425.22 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $13,347 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 1,530 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Duluth Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #709): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. APPROVAL OF SCHOOL DISTRICT REFERENDUM REVENUE AUTHORIZATION. Question text: The School Board of lndependent School District No. 709 (Duluth Public Schools), Minnesota has proposed to increase its general education revenue by the following amounts for taxes payable in the years specified: $438.00 per pupil for taxes payable in 2027; and $933.00 per pupil, which will replace the $438.00 per pupil for taxes payable in 2028 through 2036, and that amount would increase annually by the rate of inflation commencing with taxes payable in 2029. The proposed new referendum revenue authorizations would be applicable for a total of ten years, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. The additional revenue will be used to fund school operations. Shall the increase in general education revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 709 (Duluth Public Schools) for each year be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THE BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING YES FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $48,062,491.97 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $18,097 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 8,807 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Duluth Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #709): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. APPROVAL OF SCHOOL DISTRICT ADDITIONAL REFERENDUM REVENUE AUTHORIZATION. Question text: The School Board of Independent School District No. 709 (Duluth Public Schools), Minnesota has proposed to increase its general education revenue by an additional $382.00 per pupil, contingent upon Ballot Question No. 1 being approved. The proposed new referendum revenue authorization would be first levied in 2026 for taxes payable in 2027, would be applicable for ten (10) years and would be subject to an annual increase at the rate of inflation, unless otherwise revoked or reduced by law. The additional revenue will be used to fund school operations. If Ballot Question No. 1 is approved, shall the additional new increase in general education revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 709 (Duluth Public Schools) for each year also be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THE BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING YES FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $48,062,491.97 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $18,097 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 8,807 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

East Grand Forks Public Schools, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #595): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 595 (East Grand Forks) has proposed to increase its general education revenue by $300 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years beginning with taxes payable in 2027, and increase each year by the rate of inflation beginning with taxes payable in 2028, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $4,481,242.90 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $14,468 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 2,069 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

East Grand Forks Public Schools, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #595): General obligation bonds

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Bond Issue. Question text: Shall the school board of Independent School District No. 595 (East Grand Forks) also be authorized to issue its general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $26,400,000 to provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities, including safety and security improvements to building entrances, installation of updated fire alarm systems, door access and building communication systems; the construction and installation of HV AC, plumbing and electrical systems; and updating crosswalks and other ADA accessibility improvements? For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $4,481,242.90 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $14,468 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 2,069 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

East Grand Forks Public Schools, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 3 (ISD #595): General obligation bonds

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Bond Issue. Question text: If School District Question 2 is approved, shall the school board of Independent School District No. 595 (East Grand Forks) also be authorized to issue its general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $10,900,000 to provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities, including the construction and equipping of an early childhood addition to the New Heights Elementary School? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $4,481,242.90 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $14,468 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 2,069 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Eden Valley-Watkins School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #463): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Revoking Existing Referendum Revenue Authorization; Approving New Authorization. Question text: The board of Independent School District No. 463 (Eden Valley-Watkins), Minnesota has proposed to revoke the School District's existing referendum revenue authorization of $498.85 per pupil and to replace that authorization with a new authorization of $1,528 per pupil, subject to an annual increase at the rate of inflation beginning with taxes payable in 2028. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be first levied in 2026 for taxes payable in 2027 and applicable for ten (10) years unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the revocation of the existing referendum authorization and the approval of the new authorization proposed by the board of Independent School District No. 463 (Eden Valley-Watkins), Minnesota be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $3,155,670.19 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $13,887 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 841 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Elk River Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #728): General obligation bonds and capital project levy

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. School District Question 1 Approval of Bond Issue and Capital Project Levy Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 728 (Elk River Area Schools) has proposed a project for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities, including the construction and equipping of a new high school and early childhood through middle school building in Otsego, Minnesota; the construction and equipping of an education center to serve alternative high school learners and children with disabilities; the construction of safety improvements and secure entrances at school sites and facilities, including at the Zimmerman Middle/High School and Rogers Middle School; the construction and equipping of a classroom addition at the Hassan Elementary School; remodeling and updates to the career and technical education (CTE) spaces in Zimmerman, Elk River and Rogers; repair and renovation projects at school sites and facilities; the acquisition, installation, replacement, support and maintenance of software, educational software, software licenses, computers, improved technology equipment, networks, infrastructure, the costs of technology related personnel and training; the acquisition of curriculum, textbooks and materials; utility services costs and other capital revenue purposes. To provide funds for a portion of the project costs, the school board has proposed to issue general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $350,000,000. To provide funds for the remaining portion of the project costs, the school board has proposed a capital project levy authorization in the amount of 5.579% times the net tax capacity of the school district. The proposed capital project levy will raise approximately $9,000,000 for taxes payable in 2027, the first year it is to be levied, and would be authorized for ten (10) years. The estimated total cost of the projects to be funded by the capital project levy authorization is approximately $90,000,000. The projects to be funded have received a positive review and comment from the Commissioner of Education. Shall the issuance of the general obligation school building bonds and the capital project levy authorization proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 728 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $77,295,779.24 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $16,522 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 14,785 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Ely Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #696): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Revoking Existing Referendum Revenue Authorization; Approving New Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 696 (Ely Public Schools) has proposed to revoke the school district’s existing referendum revenue authorization of $347.99 per pupil and to replace that authorization with a new authorization of $1,775 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years commencing with taxes payable in 2027, and increase each year by the rate of inflation beginning with taxes payable in 2028, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the school district’s existing referendum revenue authorization be revoked, and the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 696 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $2,288,878.47 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $17,770 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 504 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Fosston Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #601): General obligation bonds and capital project levy

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of Capital Project Levy and School Building Bonds. Question text: The School Board of Independent School District No. 601 (Fosston), Minnesota has proposed a capital project levy authorization in the maximum amount of 8.583% times the net tax capacity of the school district. The proposed capital project levy authorization will raise approximately $670,000 for taxes first levied in 2026, payable in 2027, and will be authorized for ten (10) years. The estimated total cost of the projects to be funded is approximately $6,700,000. The proposed capital project levy will provide funds for curriculum, textbooks, supplies, and technology related personnel costs. In addition, the school board of Independent School District No. 601 (Fosston), Minnesota has proposed to issue its general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $3,240,000. The proposed bonds will provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities, including but not limited to the acquisition, installation, replacement, and improvement of building security and surveillance, technology hardware & software, computers, networks, infrastructure, vehicles, machinery, and equipment. The projects to be funded have received a positive review and comment from the Commissioner of Education. Shall the capital project levy and issuance of general obligation school building bonds proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 601 (Fosston), Minnesota be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $2,385,274.22 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $19,430 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 567 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Frazee-Vergas Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #23): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 23 (Frazee-Vergas Public Schools) has proposed to increase its general education revenue by $993.83 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years beginning with taxes payable in 2027, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 23 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $2,846,008 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $16,699 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 834 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

GFW Public Schools, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2365): Capital project levy

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of Capital Project Levy Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 2365 (Gibbon-Fairfax-Winthrop) has proposed a capital project levy authorization in the amount of 1.53% times the net tax capacity of the School District. The proposed capital project levy authorization will raise approximately $400,000 for taxes payable in 2027, the first year it is to be levied, and would be authorized for ten (10) years. The estimated total cost of the projects to be funded over that time period is approximately $4,000,000. The additional revenue from the proposed authorization will be used to provide funds for the acquisition and maintenance of software, technology, and technology systems, and to pay the costs of technology-related personnel and training; the purchase and replacement of school buses and school-related transportation vehicles; and the acquisition of curriculum, textbooks, and materials. The projects to be funded have received a positive Review and Comment from the Commissioner of Education. Shall the capital project levy proposed by the school board of lndependent School District No. 2365 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $6,510,516.08 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $19,393 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 573 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

GFW Public Schools, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #2365): General obligation bonds

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Bond Issue. Question text: If School District Question 1 is approved, shall the school board of Independent School District No. 2365 (Gibbon-Fairfax-Winthrop) also be authorized to issue its general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $3,200,000 to provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities, including the demolition of decommissioned school buildings? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $6,510,516.08 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $19,393 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 573 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Glencoe-Silver Lake School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2859): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Revoking Existing Referendum Revenue Authorization; Approving New Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 2859 (Glencoe-Silver Lake Public Schools) has proposed to revoke the school district’s existing referendum revenue authorization of $601.98 per pupil and to replace that authorization with a new authorization of $1,445 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years commencing with taxes payable in 2027, and increase each year by the rate of inflation beginning with taxes payable in 2028, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the school district’s existing referendum revenue authorization be revoked, and the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 2859 be approved? For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $5,328,316.86 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $15,824 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 1,351 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Grygla Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #447): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 447 (Grygla Public School) has proposed to increase its general education revenue by $665.15 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years beginning with taxes payable in 2027, and increase each year by the rate of inflation beginning with taxes payable in 2028, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 447 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $1,009,053.70 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $25,306 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 139 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Hayfield Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #203): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Revoking Existing Referendum Revenue Authorization; Approving New Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 203 (Hayfield Community Schools) has proposed to revoke the school district’s existing referendum revenue authorization of $646.12 per pupil and to replace that authorization with a new authorization of $1,250 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years commencing with taxes payable in 2027, and increase each year by the rate of inflation beginning with taxes payable in 2028, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the school district’s existing referendum revenue authorization be revoked, and the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No . 203 be approved? BY VOTING " YES " ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE . For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $3,127,307.51 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $15,710 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 630 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Henning Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #545): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Revoking Existing Referendum Revenue Authorization; Approving New Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 545 (Henning Public School) has proposed to revoke the school district's existing referendum revenue authorization of $535 per pupil and to replace that authorization with a new authorization of $2,180 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years commencing with taxes payable in 2027, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the school district's existing referendum revenue authorization be revoked, and the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 545 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $2,162,941.93 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $16,592 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 390 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Herman-Norcross Community School, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #264): School district question

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Changing Authorized Use of Bond Proceeds. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 264 (Herman-Norcross) has proposed to use approximately $800,000 of any remaining proceeds of the School District’s General Obligation Facilities Maintenance Bonds, Series 2023A, originally issued to fund the costs of certain improvements included in the School District’s facilities maintenance plan approved by the school board and the Commissioner of Education which have since been completed, to fund the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities, including the completion of various deferred maintenance projects at school sites and facilities. Shall the school board of Independent School District No. 264 (Herman-Norcross) be authorized to use approximately $800,000 of any remaining proceeds of its General Obligation Facilities Maintenance Bonds, Series 2023A, to fund the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities? For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $934,429.43 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $29,670 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 84 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Hutchinson Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #423): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 423 (Hutchinson Public Schools) has proposed to increase its general education revenue by $412 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years beginning with taxes payable in 2027 unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 423 be approved? For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $9,713,314.44 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $15,479 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 2,671 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Inver Grove Heights Schools, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #199): Capital project levy

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Renewal of Expiring Capital Project Levy. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 199 (Inver Grove Heights) has proposed a capital project levy authorization of 2.1724% times the net tax capacity of the school district. This authorization would renew the school district's existing authorization which is scheduled to expire after taxes payable in 2027. The proposed capital project levy authorization will raise approximately $1,184,795 for taxes payable in 2028, the first year it is to be levied, and would be authorized for ten years. The estimated total cost of the projects to be funded over that time period is approximately $11,847,950. The additional revenue from the proposed capital project levy authorization will provide funds for the purchase of textbooks, curriculum materials, musical instruments, classroom furnishings, equipment, technology and software for student achievement. The projects to be funded have received a positive Review and Comment from the Commissioner of Education. Shall the renewal of the capital project levy authorization proposed by the school board by Independent School District No. 199 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING TO RENEW AN EXISTING CAPITAL PROJECTS REFERENDUM THAT IS SCHEDULED TO EXPIRE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $19,130,400.12 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $17,680 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 3,405 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Jackson County Central School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2895): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Revoking Existing Referendum Revenue Authorization; Approving New Authorization. Question text: The board of Independent School District No. 2895 (Jackson County Central), Minnesota has proposed to revoke the School District's existing referendum revenue authorization of $460 per pupil and to replace that authorization with a new authorization of $1,460 per pupil, subject to an annual increase at the rate of inflation. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be first levied in 2026 for taxes payable in 2027 and applicable for ten (10) years unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the revocation of the existing referendum authorization and the approval of the new authorization proposed by the board of Independent School District No. 2895 (Jackson County Central), Minnesota be approved? BY VOTING “YES” ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $4,792,275.70 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $15,024 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 1,080 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Kasson-Mantorville School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #204): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of New School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The board of Independent School District No. 204 (Kasson-Mantorville), Minnesota has proposed to increase the School District’s referendum revenue by $500 per pupil, subject to an annual increase at the rate of inflation. The proposed new referendum revenue authorization would be first levied in 2026 for taxes payable in 2027 and applicable for ten (10) years unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the new referendum authorization proposed by the board of Independent School District No. 204(Kasson-Mantorville), Minnesota, be approved? BY VOTING “YES” ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $7,330,376.96 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $12,716 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 2,107 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Kimball Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #739): Capital project levy

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of Capital Project Levy Authorization to Fund Technology. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 739 (Kimball Area Public Schools) has proposed a capital project levy authorization of 6.022% times the net tax capacity of the school district. The additional revenue from the proposed capital project levy authorization will provide funds for safety and security improvements; cybersecurity protections; and the acquisition, installation, replacement, support and maintenance of software, software licenses, computers, improved technology equipment, networks, infrastructure, and the costs of technology related personnel and training. The proposed capital project levy authorization will raise approximately $661,605 for taxes payable in 2027, the first year it is to be levied, and would be authorized for ten years. The estimated total cost of the projects to be funded over that time period is approximately $6,616,050. Shall the capital project levy authorization proposed by the school board by Independent School District NO. 739 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $2,810,180.76 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $15,417 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 774 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Lake Crystal-Wellcome Memorial, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2071): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 2071 (Lake Crystal Wellcome Memorial) has proposed to increase its general education revenue by $391 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years beginning with taxes payable in 2027, and increase each year by the rate of inflation beginning with taxes payable in 2028, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 2071 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $4,469,360.85 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $14,530 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 939 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Lake Park Audubon School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2889): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. School District Question 1 Revoking Existing Referendum Revenue Authorization; Approving New Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 2889 (Lake Park Audubon Public School) has proposed to revoke the school district’s existing referendum revenue authorization of $194.58 per pupil and to replace that authorization with a new authorization of $1,683.10 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years commencing with taxes payable in 2027, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the school district’s existing referendum revenue authorization be revoked, and the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 2889 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $3,222,540.74 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $16,029 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 622 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Lake Park Audubon School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #2889): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. School District Question 2 Approval of School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 2889 (Lake Park Audubon Public Schools) has also proposed to increase its general education revenue by $600 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years beginning with taxes payable in 2027, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. If School District Question 1 is approved, shall the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 2889 also be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $3,222,540.74 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $16,029 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 622 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Lanesboro Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #229): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. School District Question 1 Approval of School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: School District Question 1 Approval of School District Referendum Revenue Authorization The school board of Independent School District No. 229 (Lanesboro Public Schools) has proposed to increase its general education revenue by $850 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years beginning with taxes payable in 2027, and increase each year by the rate of inflation beginning with taxes payable in 2028, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 229 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $1,158,526.56 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $14,597 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 413 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Laporte Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #306): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 306 (Laporte Public School) has proposed to increase its general education revenue by $1,344.85 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years beginning with taxes payable in 2027, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 306 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $1,311,948.43 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $17,830 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 309 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Litchfield Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #465): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 465 (Litchfield Public Schools) has proposed to increase its general education revenue by $415 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years beginning with taxes payable in 2027, and increase each year by the rate of inflation beginning with taxes payable in 2028, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 465 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $6,629,247.16 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $15,857 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 1,534 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Litchfield Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #465): General obligation bonds

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Bond Issue. Question text: Shall the school board of Independent School District No. 465 (Litchfield Public Schools) also be authorized to issue its general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $15,400,000 to provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities, including the construction of improvements, renovations and upgrades to the Wagner Education Building, including the construction of a secure entrance, parking lot expansion, boiler replacement, the acquisition and installation of a new fire suppression system, and updates to rest rooms; renovations and updates to the High School/Middle School site and facility, including the remodeling of locker rooms and the construction of ADA accessibility renovations to special education spaces; the construction of mechanical, HVAC and lighting updates to school sites and facilities; and the construction of repairs to the grandstand to the football stadium? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $6,629,247.16 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $15,857 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 1,534 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Lynd Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #415): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. NOTICE OF SPECIAL ELECTION INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 415 (LYND PUBLIC SCHOOL) STATE OF MINNESOTA School District Question 1 Approval of School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 415 (Lynd Public School) has proposed to increase its general education revenue by $700 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years beginning with taxes payable in 2027, and increase each year by the rate of inflation beginning with taxes payable in 2028, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Yes No Shall the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No.415 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $577,289.27 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $15,231 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 163 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Maple Lake Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #881): Capital project levy

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of Capital Project Levy Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 881 (Maple Lake Public Schools) has proposed a capital project levy authorization of 1.5841% times the net tax capacity of the school district. The additional revenue from the proposed authorization will be used to provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities; deferred maintenance; the acquisition and maintenance of software, technology, and technology systems, and to pay the costs of technology-related personnel and training; the acquisition of curriculum, textbooks, and materials; and other operating capital revenue purposes. The proposed capital project levy authorization will raise approximately $195,000 for taxes payable in 2028, the first year it is to be levied, and would be authorized for ten years. The estimated total cost of the projects to be funded over that time period is approximately $1,950,000. Shall the capital project levy authorization proposed by the school board by Independent School District No. 881 be approved? BY VOTING ''YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $3,714,025.84 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $16,724 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 724 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Nevis Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #308): General obligation bonds

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. APPROVAL OF SCHOOL BUILDING BONDS. Question text: Shall the school board of Independent School District No. 308 (Nevis Public School), Minnesota be authorized to issue its general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $11,100,000 to provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities including, but not limited to, the construction and equipping of career and technical education (CTE) spaces; the construction and equipping of new classrooms; the repurposing and remodeling of existing classrooms and spaces for educational needs; renovations and updates to the safe and secure entrances and office area; the renovation and equipping of the existing kitchen, cafeteria, and restrooms; and addressing deferred maintenance including but not limited to playgrounds, technology and security cameras and building access? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $1,424,142.32 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $14,790 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 608 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Nevis Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #308): General obligation bonds

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. APPROVAL OF SCHOOL BUILDING BONDS. Question text: If School District Question 1 is approved, shall the school board of Independent School District No. 308 (Nevis Public School), Minnesota be authorized to issue its general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $6,050,000 to provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities including, but not limited to, the construction and equipping of a multi-purpose physical education space, fitness area, restrooms and additional parking? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $1,424,142.32 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $14,790 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 608 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Nevis Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 3 (ISD #308): General obligation bonds

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. APPROVAL OF SCHOOL BUILDING BONDS. Question text: If School District Question 1 is approved, shall the school board of Independent School District No. 308 (Nevis Public School), Minnesota be authorized to issue its general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $425,000 to provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities including, but not limited to, the construction and equipping of a bus maintenance building? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $1,424,142.32 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $14,790 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 608 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

New London-Spicer School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #345): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 345 (New London-Spicer) has proposed to increase its general education revenue by $1,358.94 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years beginning with taxes payable in 2027 unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 345 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $8,217,488.34 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $16,917 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 1,534 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

New York Mills Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #553): General obligation bonds and capital project levy

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School Building Bonds; New Capital Project Levy Authorization. Question text: The School Board of Independent School District No. 553 (New York Mills), Minnesota has proposed to issue general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $22,160,000 to provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities including, but not limited to, construction and equipping of a band and choir suite; construction and renovation to physical education space, fitness room and wrestling rooms; renovation and construction of career and technical education (CTE) spaces; construction and equipping of new classrooms; repurposing and remodeling of existing classrooms and spaces for educational needs; renovations and updates to the administrative office areas, including construction of secure entrances; renovation and equipping of the existing kitchen, concession stand, and restrooms; and addressing deferred capital maintenance including, but not limited to, flooring, main gym sound system, building envelope, water drainage and parking lot improvements. The School Board has also proposed a new capital project levy authorization in the maximum amount of 2.7102% times the net tax capacity of the School District. The proposed capital project levy authorization will raise approximately $200,000 for taxes first levied in 2026, payable in 2027, and will be authorized for ten (10) years. The estimated total cost of the projects to be funded is approximately $2,000,000. The additional revenue from the proposed capital project levy authorization will be used to provide funds for technology, including student and staff devices, updated classroom technology, network and technology infrastructure, safety, security and cybersecurity upgrades and to pay the costs of technology related personnel and training, transportation, curriculum, and facilities upgrades and utility service costs. The projects to be funded have received a positive review and comment from the Commissioner of Education. Shall the issuance of the general obligation school building bonds and the new capital project levy authorization proposed by the School Board of Independent School 'District No. 553 (New York Mills), Minnesota, be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $1,784,751.99 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $13,595 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 790 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

New York Mills Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #553): General obligation bonds

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School Building Bonds. Question text: If School District Question 1 above is approved, shall the School Board of Independent School District No. 553 (New York Mills), Minnesota, be authorized to issue general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $2,600,000 for acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities including, but not limited to, remodeling and repurposing of the existing media center; replacement of the auditorium sound system, rigging, lights and interior finishes; and addressing deferred capital maintenance needs at the bus garage? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $1,784,751.99 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $13,595 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 790 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

New York Mills Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 3 (ISD #553): General obligation bonds

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School Building Bonds. Question text: If School District Question 1 above is approved, shall the School Board of Independent School District No. 553 (New York Mills), Minnesota, be authorized to issue general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $5,490,000 for acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities including, but not limited to, construction and equipping a new football field and track facility and new softball and baseball fields? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $1,784,751.99 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $13,595 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 790 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

North St. Paul-Maplewood Oakdale Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #622): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 622 (North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale) has proposed to increase its general education revenue by $800 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years beginning with taxes payable in 2027, and increase each year by the rate of inflation beginning with taxes payable in 2028, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 622 be approved? For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $69,993,802.64 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $18,069 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 10,666 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Northland Community Schools, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #118): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of New School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The board of Independent School District No. 118 (Northland Community Schools), Minnesota has proposed to increase the School District’s referendum revenue by $1,780 per pupil. The proposed new referendum revenue authorization would be first levied in 2026 for taxes payable in 2027 and applicable for ten (10) years unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the new referendum authorization proposed by the board of Independent School District No. 118 (Northland Community Schools), Minnesota, be approved? BY VOTING “YES” ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $2,430,004.05 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $25,925 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 315 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Ortonville Public Schools, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2903): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. REVOKING EXISTING REFERENDUM REVENUE AUTHORIZATION; APPROVING NEW AUTHORIZATION. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 2903 (Ortonville Public Schools), Minnesota has proposed to revoke the School District's existing referendum authorization of $597. 76 per pupil and to replace that authorization with a new authorization of $1,050 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years beginning with taxes payable in 2027, and increase each year by the rate of inflation beginning with taxes payable in 2028, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the increase in revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 2903 (Ortonville Public Schools), Minnesota be approved? PASSAGE OF THIS REFERENDUM WILL RESULT IN AN INCREASE IN YOUR PROPERTY TAXES For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $1,500,594.10 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $14,969 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 529 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Ortonville Public Schools, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #2903): General obligation bonds and capital project levy

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. APPROVAL OF SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPITAL PROJECT LEVY AND BOND ISSUE. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 2903 (Ortonville Public Schools), Minnesota has proposed a capital project levy authorization of 1.380% times the net tax capacity of the school district. The proposed capital project levy authorization will raise approximately $150,000 for taxes first levied in 2026, payable in 2027, and would be authorized for ten (10) years. The estimated total cost of the projects to be funded over that time period is approximately $1,500,000. The proposed capital project levy will provide funds for curriculum, textbooks, supplies, technology and information technology salaries, benefits and services. [The projects to be funded have received a positive review and comment from the Commissioner of Education.] In addition, the school board of Independent School District No. 2903 (Ortonville Public Schools) has proposed to issue its general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $2,520,000. The proposed bonds will provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities, including but not limited to the acquisition, installation, replacement, maintenance and improvement of building security and surveillance, playground, technology hardware & software, computers, networks, infrastructure, vehicles, machinery, and equipment. Shall the issuance of general obligation bonds and the capital project levy proposed by the school board oflndependent School District No. 2903 (Ortonville Public Schools) be approved? BY VOTING “YES” ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $1,500,594.10 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $14,969 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 529 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Park Rapids Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #309): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 309 (Park Rapids Area Schools) has proposed to increase its general education revenue by $1,111.09 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years beginning with taxes payable in 2027, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 309 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $7,587,762.54 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $18,096 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 1,568 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Pequot Lakes Public Schools, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #186): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of New School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The board of Independent School District No. 186 (Pequot Lakes Public Schools), Minnesota has proposed to increase the School District’s referendum revenue by $1,160 per pupil, subject to an annual increase at the rate of inflation. The proposed new referendum revenue authorization would be first levied in 2026 for taxes payable in 2027 and applicable for ten (10) years unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the new referendum authorization proposed by the board of Independent School District No. 186 (Pequot Lakes Public Schools), Minnesota, be approved? BY VOTING “YES” ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $10,308,970.38 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $14,111 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 1,751 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Perham-Dent Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #549): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of New School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The board of Independent School District No. 549 (Perham-Dent Public Schools), Minnesota has proposed to increase the School District's referendum revenue by $1,135 per pupil. The proposed new referendum revenue authorization would be first levied in 2026 for taxes payable in 2027 and applicable for ten (10) years unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the new referendum authorization proposed by the board of Independent School District No. 549 (Perham-Dent Public Schools), Minnesota, be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $6,037,613.70 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $13,455 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 1,684 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Pipestone Area School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2689): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Revoking Existing Referendum Revenue Authorization; Approving New Authorization. Question text: The board of Independent School District No. 2689 (Pipestone Area Schools), Minnesota has proposed to revoke the School District's existing referendum revenue authorization of $474.26 per pupil and to replace that authorization with a new authorization of $1,500 per pupil, subject to an annual increase at the rate of inflation. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be first levied in 2026 for taxes payable in 2027 and applicable for ten (10) years unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the revocation of the existing referendum authorization and the approval of the new authorization proposed by the board of Independent School District No. 2689 (Pipestone Area Schools), Minnesota be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $4,428,218.04 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $15,253 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 1,121 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Prior Lake-Savage Area Schools, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #719): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Revoking Existing Referendum Revenue Authorization; Approving New Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 719 (Prior Lake-Savage Area Schools) has also proposed to revoke the school district's existing referendum revenue authorization of $623.97 per pupil and to replace that authorization with a new authorization of $1,740.97 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years commencing with taxes payable in 2027, and increase each year by the rate of inflation beginning with taxes payable in 2028, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the school district's existing referendum revenue authorization be revoked, and the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 719 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $35,661,197.94 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $14,417 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 8,709 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Prior Lake-Savage Area Schools, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #719): Capital project levy

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of Capital Project Levy Authorization. Question text: The school board of lndependent School District No. 719 (Prior Lake-Savage Area Schools) has also proposed a capital project levy authorization of 3.427% times the net tax capacity of the school district. The additional revenue from the proposed authorization will be used to provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities; safety and security improvements; deferred maintenance and utility service costs; the acquisition and maintenance of software, technology, and technology systems, and to pay the costs of technology-related personnel and training; the purchase and replacement of school-related transportation vehicles; the acquisition of curriculum, textbooks, and materials; and other operating capital revenue purposes. The proposed capital project levy authorization will raise approximately $3,800,000 for taxes payable in 2028, the first year it is to be levied, and would be authorized for ten years. The estimated total cost of the projects to be funded over that time period is approximately $38,000,000. The projects to be funded have received a positive Review and Comment from the Commissioner of Education. If School District Question 1 is approved, shall the capital project levy authorization proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 719 also be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $35,661,197.94 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $14,417 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 8,709 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Randolph Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #195): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The school board of lndependent School District No. 195 (Randolph Public Schools) has proposed to increase its general education revenue by $450 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years beginning with taxes payable in 2027, and increase each year by the rate of inflation beginning with taxes payable in 2028, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 195 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $1,769,745.36 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $13,183 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 860 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Red Wing Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #256): General obligation bonds and capital project levy

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of Bond Issue and Capital Project Levy Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 256 (Red Wing Schools) has proposed a project for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities, including renovations, remodeling, upgrades and improvements to the Sunnyside Elementary School, including the installation of a new fire alarm system, the creation of pre-kindergarten and kindergarten learning spaces, repurposing the existing cafeteria to create a multi-purpose large motor room, and remodeling the central building corridor to create an art room, cafeteria, Head Start room and special education learning spaces; the construction and installation of mechanical, HVAC and electrical infrastructure improvements; the acquisition and installation of replacement windows; the remodeling and upgrading of restrooms, including ADA accessibility improvements, at school sites and facilities; upgrades to casework, flooring and finishes; the acquisition and installation of furniture, fixtures and equipment; and the construction and installation of a new early childhood playground; acquisition, installation, replacement, support and maintenance of software, educational software, software licenses, computers, improved technology equipment, networks, infrastructure, the costs of technology related personnel and training; the acquisition of curriculum, textbooks and materials; deferred maintenance costs, utility services costs and other capital revenue purposes. To provide funds for a portion of the project costs, the school board has proposed to issue general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $12,860,000. To provide funds for the remaining portion of the project costs, the school board has proposed a capital project levy authorization in the amount of 2.881% times the net tax capacity of the school district. The proposed capital project levy will raise approximately $1,500,000 for taxes payable in 2027, the first year it is to be levied, and would be authorized for ten (10) years. The estimated total cost of the projects to be funded by the capital project levy authorization is approximately $15,000,000. The projects to be funded have received a positive review and comment from the Commissioner of Education. Shall the issuance of the general obligation school building bonds and the capital project levy authorization proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 256 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $10,220,164.29 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $15,852 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 2,176 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Robbinsdale Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #281): General obligation bonds

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. APPROVAL OF SCHOOL BUILDING BONDS. Question text: Shall the school board of Independent School District No. 281 (Robbinsdale Area Schools) be authorized to issue general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $343,000,000 to provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities including, but not limited to: construction, renovation and expansion of Cooper High School; renovation of Plymouth Middle School including pool improvement; renovation of Sandburg Middle School including the decommission and repurposing of the pool; construction, renovation, and repurposing of Armstrong High School; expansion, renovation, and/or repurposing of elementary schools; construction of a storage garage for school district vehicles and equipment; and renovation and repurposing of other district sites and facilities to align facility use with enrollment and program needs, including early childhood? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $76,522,867.05 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $20,090 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 10,326 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Robbinsdale Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #281): General obligation bonds

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. APPROVAL OF SCHOOL BUILDING BONDS. Question text: If School District Question 1 is approved, shall the school board of Independent School District No. 281 (Robbinsdale Area Schools) be authorized to issue general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $17,000,000 to provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities including, but not limited to: renovation and repurposing the pool area of Sandburg Middle School and construction thereon of a performing arts space; renovation and repurposing of Plymouth Middle School to house the Spanish Immersion and other district programs, and the construction of playgrounds at such site; and renovation and repurposing of Armstrong High School to house a middle school with capacity for 1,100 students, and other district-wide programs? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $76,522,867.05 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $20,090 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 10,326 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Robbinsdale Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 3 (ISD #281): General obligation bonds

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. APPROVAL OF SCHOOL BUILDING BONDS. Question text: If School District Question 1 and School District Question 2 are approved, shall the school board of Independent School District No. 281 (Robbinsdale Area Schools) be authorized to issue general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $53,000,000 to provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities including, but not limited to: construction of a new four-section neighborhood elementary school at the Robbinsdale Middle School site; and renovation and repurposing of district sites and facilities for educational programming and district-wide services? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $76,522,867.05 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $20,090 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 10,326 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Rocori Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #750): Capital project levy

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Renewal of Expiring Capital Project Levy To Fund Technology. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 750 (Rocori School District) has proposed a capital project levy authorization of 1.836% times the net tax capacity of the school district. This authorization would renew the school district’s existing authorization which is scheduled to expire after taxes payable in 2027. The proposed capital project levy authorization will raise approximately $497,414 for taxes payable in 2028, the first year it is to be levied, and would be authorized for ten years. The estimated total cost of the projects to be funded over that time period is approximately $4,974,140. The additional revenue from the proposed capital project levy authorization will provide funds for the acquisition, installation, replacement, support and maintenance of software, software licenses, computers, improved technology equipment, networks, infrastructure, and the costs of technology related personnel and training. Shall the capital project levy authorization proposed by the school board by Independent School District No. 750 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING TO RENEW AN EXISTING CAPITAL PROJECTS REFERENDUM THAT IS SCHEDULED TO EXPIRE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $7,707,425.70 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $14,764 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 2,376 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Sauk Centre Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #743): Capital project levy

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Renewal of Expiring Capital Project Levy To Fund Technology. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 743 (Sauk Centre Public Schools) has proposed a capital project levy authorization of 2.281% times the net tax capacity of the school district. This authorization would renew the school district’s existing authorization which is scheduled to expire after taxes payable in 2027. The proposed capital project levy authorization will raise approximately $388,061 for taxes payable in 2028, the first year it is to be levied, and would be authorized for ten years. The estimated total cost of the projects to be funded over that time period is approximately $3,880,610. The additional revenue from the proposed capital project levy authorization will provide funds for the acquisition, installation, replacement, support and maintenance of software, software licenses, computers, improved technology equipment, networks, infrastructure, and the costs of technology related personnel and training. Shall the capital project levy authorization proposed by the school board by Independent School District No.743be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING TO RENEW AN EXISTING CAPITAL PROJECTS REFERENDUM THAT IS SCHEDULED TO EXPIRE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $7,155,002.41 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $16,666 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 1,091 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Sebeka Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #820): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 820 (Sebeka Public School) has proposed to increase its general education revenue by $842 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years beginning with taxes payable in 2027 unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 820 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $1,548,186.71 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $16,841 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 425 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Sibley East School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2310): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The school board of Independent School District No. 2310 (Sibley East Public Schools) has proposed to increase its general education revenue by $850 per pupil. The proposed referendum revenue authorization would be applicable for ten years beginning with taxes payable in 2027, unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the increase in the revenue proposed by the school board of Independent School District No. 2310 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $4,336,592.47 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $14,101 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 1,055 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

St. Charles Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #858): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of New School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The board of Independent School District No. 858 (St. Charles Public Schools), Minnesota has proposed to increase the School District’s referendum revenue by $650 per pupil, subject to an annual increase at the rate of inflation. The proposed new referendum revenue authorization would be first levied in 2026 for taxes payable in 2027 and applicable for ten (10) years unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the new referendum authorization proposed by the board of Independent School District No. 858 (St. Charles Public Schools), Minnesota, be approved? BY VOTING “YES” ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $2,927,851.31 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $12,341 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 919 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

St. Louis County School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2142): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of New School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The board of Independent School District No. 2142 (St. Louis County), Minnesota, has proposed to increase the School District's general education revenue by $3,160 per pupil, subject to an annual increase at the rate of inflation. The proposed new referendum revenue authorization would be first levied in 2026 for taxes payable in 2027 and applicable for ten (10) years unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the new referendum authorization proposed by the board of Independent School District No. 2142 (St. Louis County), Minnesota, be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $6,934,489.54 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $21,247 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 1,813 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

St. Louis County School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #2142): Capital project levy

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Capital Project Levy Authorization. Question text: The board of Independent School District No. 2142 (St. Louis County), Minnesota, has proposed a capital project levy authorization in the maximum amount of 2.775% times the net tax capacity of the School District. The proposed capital project levy authorization will raise approximately $1,500,000 for taxes first levied in 2026, payable in 2027, and will be authorized for ten (10) years. The estimated total cost of the projects to be funded over that time period is approximately $15,000,000. The proposed authorization will provide funds for technology and other capital expenditures, including hardware, software, curriculum materials, and student transportation vehicles. The projects to be funded have received a positive review and comment from the Commissioner of Education. If School District Question 1 above is approved, shall the capital project levy authorization proposed by the board of Independent School District No. 2142 (St. Louis County), Minnesota, be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $6,934,489.54 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $21,247 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 1,813 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Underwood Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #550): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of New School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The board of Independent School District No. 550 (Underwood Public Schools), Minnesota has proposed to increase the School District's referendum revenue by $1,591 per pupil, subject to an annual increase at the rate of inflation. The proposed new referendum revenue authorization would be first levied in 2026 for taxes payable in 2027 and applicable for ten (10) years unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the new referendum authorization proposed by the board of Independent School District No. 550 (Underwood Public Schools), Minnesota, be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $1,469,936.78 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $15,746 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 512 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

United South Central School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2134): General obligation bonds

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School Building Bonds. Question text: Shall the board of Independent School District No. 2134 (United South Central), Minnesota be authorized to issue general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $22,895,000 for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities including, but not limited to, additions and renovations to improve elementary and early childhood learning spaces, instructional support areas, and physical education facilities; improvements to school offices and technology infrastructure; traffic flow and parking improvements; and the completion of various deferred capital maintenance projects at school sites and facilities? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $3,927,823.69 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $18,377 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 796 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Walker-Hackensack-Akeley School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #113): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of New School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The board of Independent School District No. 113 (Walker-Hackensack-Akeley), Minnesota has proposed to increase the School District’s referendum revenue by $1,847 per pupil. The proposed new referendum revenue authorization would be first levied in 2026 for taxes payable in 2027 and applicable for ten (10) years unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. Shall the new referendum authorization proposed by the board of Independent School District No. 113 (Walker-Hackensack-Akeley), Minnesota, be approved? BY VOTING “YES” ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $3,065,489.29 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $24,467 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 643 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Walker-Hackensack-Akeley School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #113): Referendum revenue authorization

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of New School District Referendum Revenue Authorization. Question text: The board of Independent School District No. 113 (Walker-Hackensack-Akeley), Minnesota has proposed to increase the School District’s referendum revenue by $553 per pupil. The proposed new referendum revenue authorization would be first levied in 2026 for taxes payable in 2027 and applicable for ten (10) years unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law. If School District Question 1 is approved, shall the new referendum authorization proposed by the board of Independent School District No. 113 (Walker-Hackensack-Akeley), Minnesota, be approved? BY VOTING “YES” ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $3,065,489.29 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $24,467 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 643 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

West Central Area, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2342): General obligation bonds

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of School District Bond Issue. Question text: Shall the school board of Independent School District No. 2342 (West Central Area Schools) be authorized to issue its general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $33,805,000 to provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities, including the construction and equipping of an elementary school addition; renovations and upgrades to science rooms and career and technical education (CTE) spaces; deferred maintenance; remodeling and updates to special education classrooms; the construction of softball fields, a track, fitness center and playground improvements; and the completion of water retention, grading and utility improvements to the school site and facility? For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $2,783,741.62 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $16,600 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 701 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

West St. Paul-Mendota Heights-Eagan, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #197): Capital project levy

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Approval of Capital Project Levy Authorization. Question text: The school board of lndependent School District No. 197 (West St. Paul-Mendota Heights-Eagan) has proposed a capital project levy authorization of 4.027% times the net tax capacity of the school district. The additional revenue from the proposed authorization will be used to provide funds for safety and security improvements; textbooks and teaching materials; school transportation vehicles; school facility maintenance; cybersecurity protections; utility service costs; and other operating capital revenue purposes permitted by law. The proposed capital project levy authorization will raise approximately $4,600,000 for taxes payable in 2027, the first year it is to be levied, and would be authorized for ten years. The estimated total cost of the projects to be funded over that time period is approximately $46,000,000. The projects to be funded have received a positive Review and Comment from the Commissioner of Education. Shall the capital project levy authorization proposed by the school board by Independent School District No. 197 be approved? BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE. For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $39,496,396.22 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $19,512 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 5,362 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Winona Area Public School District, SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #861): Capital project levy

On the Nov 3, 2026 ballot. Renewal of Capital Project Levy Authorization for Technology. Question text: The board oflndependent School District No. 861 (Winona Area Public Schools), Minnesota, has proposed to renew its capital project levy authorization, scheduled to expire after taxes payable in 2026, in the amount of 3.383% times the net tax capacity of the School District. The proposed tax rate is not being increased from the previous year's rate. The proposed renewal of the expiring capital project levy authorization will raise approximately $1,683,000 for taxes payable in 2027, the first year it is to be levied, and would be authorized for ten (10) years. The estimated total cost of the projects to be funded over that time period is approximately $16,830,000. The additional revenue from the proposed capital project levy authorization renewal will be used to fund technology, including technology equipment, software, systems, and services to support Career and Technical Education programs and instruction, technology systems related to safety and security, classroom and building technology, digital curriculum, support and maintenance of software, software licenses, computers, technology infrastructure and network improvements, device replacement, and to pay the costs of technology related personnel and training. Shall the capital project levy authorization renewal to fund technology proposed by the board of Independent School District No. 861 (Winona Area Public Schools), Minnesota, be approved? BY VOTING YES ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING TO RENEW AN EXISTING CAPITAL PROJECTS REFERENDUM THAT IS SCHEDULED TO EXPIRE For context, from the district’s page: Certified school property tax levy, all categories (MDE); context, not the cost of this question: $13,236,280.59 (Pay 26); General Fund spending per ADM (average daily membership), MDE: $18,484 (FY2025); Enrollment, October 1 (MDE): 2,326 students (2025–26). These are not an estimate of what the question would cost a taxpayer.

Type shown as “Referendum revenue authorization”

Questions whose title or text says “referendum revenue authorization”, and names neither general obligation bonds nor a capital project levy.

Type shown as “General obligation bonds”

Questions whose text asks to issue general obligation bonds, and names neither a referendum revenue authorization nor a capital project levy.

Type shown as “Capital project levy”

Questions whose title or text says “capital project levy”, and names neither general obligation bonds nor a referendum revenue authorization.

Type shown as “General obligation bonds and a capital project levy in one question”

Questions whose text asks to issue general obligation bonds and also names a capital project levy.

Type shown as “Other school district questions”

Questions whose title and text fit none of the groups above.

What the law says: the notice on a ballot question

Some question texts on this page carry a notice in capital letters. These passages are about that notice. This page does not say which notice any question had to carry, or whether a question’s wording meets these passages.

Minn. Stat. 275.60 (a) (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/275.60)

Notwithstanding any general or special law or any charter provisions, but subject to section 126C.17, subdivision 9, any question submitted to the voters by any local governmental subdivision at a general or special election after June 8, 1995, authorizing a property tax levy or tax rate increase, including the issuance of debt obligations payable in whole or in part from property taxes, must include on the ballot the following notice in boldface type:

Minn. Stat. 275.60 (a) (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/275.60)

"BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING FOR A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE."

Minn. Stat. 275.60 (c) (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/275.60)

This section does not apply to a school district bond election if the debt service payments are to be made entirely from transfers of revenue from the capital fund to the debt service fund.

Minn. Stat. 126C.17, subd. 9(a) (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/126C.17#stat.126C.17.9)

The notice required under section 275.60 may be modified to read, in cases of renewing existing levies at the same amount per pupil as in the previous year:

A later change the Revisor lists for section 126C.17, subdivision 9

The Revisor’s page for section 126C.17 lists a later change to subdivision 9 that is not in the 2025 edition quoted here: “2026 Subd. 9 Amended 2026 c 88 art 1 s 34”.

Minn. Stat. 126C.17, subd. 9(a) (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/126C.17#stat.126C.17.9)

"BY VOTING "YES" ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING TO EXTEND AN EXISTING PROPERTY TAX REFERENDUM THAT IS SCHEDULED TO EXPIRE."

Minn. Stat. 123B.63, subd. 3(d) (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/123B.63#stat.123B.63.3)

If the district proposes a new capital project to begin at the time the existing capital project expires and at the same maximum tax rate, the general description on the ballot may state that the capital project levy is being renewed and that the tax rate is not being increased from the previous year's rate.

Minn. Stat. 123B.63, subd. 3(d) (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/123B.63#stat.123B.63.3)

The ballot notice required under section 275.60 may be modified to read:

Minn. Stat. 123B.63, subd. 3(d) (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/123B.63#stat.123B.63.3)

"BY VOTING YES ON THIS BALLOT QUESTION, YOU ARE VOTING TO RENEW AN EXISTING CAPITAL PROJECTS REFERENDUM THAT IS SCHEDULED TO EXPIRE."

What the law says: school district election dates

This passage is about the dates on which a school district special election is held.

Minn. Stat. 205A.05, subd. 1a(a) (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/205A.05#stat.205A.05.1a)

Except as allowed in paragraph (b), a special election held in a school district must be held on one of the following dates: the second Tuesday in February, the second Tuesday in April, the second Tuesday in May, the second Tuesday in August, or the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November.

Minn. Stat. 126C.17, subd. 9(a) (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/126C.17#stat.126C.17.9)

Unless the referendum is conducted by mail under subdivision 11, paragraph (a), the referendum must be held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November.

What the law says: referendum revenue questions

These passages are about a referendum to increase a district’s revenue.

Minn. Stat. 126C.17, subd. 9(a) (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/126C.17#stat.126C.17.9)

The revenue authorized by section 126C.10, subdivision 1, may be increased in the amount approved by the voters of the district at a referendum called for the purpose.

Minn. Stat. 126C.17, subd. 9(a) (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/126C.17#stat.126C.17.9)

The referendum may be called by the board.

Minn. Stat. 126C.17, subd. 9(a) (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/126C.17#stat.126C.17.9)

The ballot must state the maximum amount of the increased revenue per adjusted pupil unit.

Minn. Stat. 126C.17, subd. 9(a) (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/126C.17#stat.126C.17.9)

The ballot must designate the specific number of years, not to exceed ten, for which the referendum authorization applies.

Minn. Stat. 126C.17, subd. 9(d) (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/126C.17#stat.126C.17.9)

The approval of 50 percent plus one of those voting on the question is required to pass a referendum authorized by this subdivision.

What the law says: bond questions

These passages are about a vote on issuing obligations (bonds), and about the commissioner’s review and comment on a school construction proposal. Section 475.58, subdivision 1, goes on to list the obligations for which no election is required; that list is not quoted here.

Minn. Stat. 475.51, subd. 2 (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/475.51#stat.475.51.2)

"Municipality" means a city of any class, county, town, or school district.

Minn. Stat. 475.58, subd. 1 (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/475.58#stat.475.58.1)

Obligations authorized by law or charter may be issued by any municipality upon obtaining the approval of a majority of the electors voting on the question of issuing the obligations, but an election shall not be required to authorize obligations issued:

Minn. Stat. 123B.71, subd. 8 (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/123B.71#stat.123B.71.8)

A school district, a special education cooperative, or a cooperative unit of government, as defined in section 123A.24, subdivision 2, must not enter into an installment contract for purchase or a lease agreement, hold a referendum for bonds, nor solicit bids for new construction, expansion, or remodeling of an educational facility that requires an expenditure in excess of $500,000 per school site if it has a capital loan outstanding, or $2,000,000 per school site if it does not have a capital loan outstanding, prior to review and comment by the commissioner.

Minn. Stat. 123B.70, subd. 4 (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/123B.70#stat.123B.70.4)

If the commissioner submits an unfavorable review and comment for a proposal under section 123B.71, the school board, by resolution of the board, must reconsider construction. If, upon reconsideration, the school board decides to proceed with construction, it may initiate proceedings for issuing bonds to finance construction under chapter 475. Unless 60 percent of the voters at the election approve of issuing the obligations, the board is not authorized to issue the obligations.

What the law says: capital project levy questions

These passages are about a capital project levy referendum.

Minn. Stat. 123B.63, subd. 3(a) (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/123B.63#stat.123B.63.3)

A district may levy the local tax rate approved by a majority of the electors voting on the question to provide funds for an approved project.

Minn. Stat. 123B.63, subd. 3(a) (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/123B.63#stat.123B.63.3)

If a review and comment is required under section 123B.71, subdivision 8, a referendum for a project not receiving a positive review and comment by the commissioner must be approved by at least 60 percent of the voters at the election.

Minn. Stat. 123B.63, subd. 3(c) (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/123B.63#stat.123B.63.3)

The ballot must provide a general description of the proposed project, state the estimated total cost of the project, state whether the project has received a positive or negative review and comment from the commissioner, state the maximum amount of the capital project levy as a percentage of net tax capacity, state the amount that will be raised by that local tax rate in the first year it is to be levied, and state the maximum number of years that the levy authorization will apply.

Minn. Stat. 123B.63, subd. 3(c) (Minnesota Statutes 2025; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/123B.63#stat.123B.63.3)

If approved, the amount provided by the approved local tax rate applied to the net tax capacity for the year preceding the year the levy is certified may be certified for the number of years, not to exceed ten, approved.

About these quotations

Quoted word for word from Minnesota Statutes 2025, as the Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes published it online (retrieved October 6, 2026). Each quotation is part of a section, not the whole of it; follow the link to read the section. This is not legal advice.

State constitutional amendment (not a school district question)

The Secretary of State’s list holds one statewide question: a proposed amendment to the Minnesota Constitution, put to every voter in the state. It is not a school district’s question and is not counted among the questions above. It is shown here with its official title and text, and with the text of the law that proposes it.

CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 1: Increasing funding to school districts

The title and question below are as the Minnesota Secretary of State’s list prints them. Question text: Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to increase the funding going to all school districts from the permanent school fund, which is a fund that supports school districts without raising individual income or property taxes, effective July 1, 2027?

The law that proposes it: Laws of Minnesota 2026, chapter 114

Quoted word for word from the chapter as the Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes published it online (retrieved October 6, 2026). The chapter marks the words it deletes from the constitution and the words it adds; they are labelled here as it marks them. (https://www.revisor.mn.gov/laws/2026/0/114/)

Laws of Minnesota 2026, chapter 114, section 1

An amendment to the Minnesota Constitution is proposed to the people. If the amendment is adopted, article XI, section 8, will read: In the text of article XI, section 8, that follows, the chapter changes one passage. After the words “Within limitations prescribed by law, the fund shall be invested” it prints:

Struck (printed by the chapter as language to be deleted)

to secure the maximum return consistent with the maintenance of the perpetuity of the fund. The principal of the permanent school fund shall be perpetual and inviolate forever. This does not prevent the sale of investments at less than the cost to the fund; however, all losses not offset by gains shall be repaid to the fund from the interest and dividends earned thereafter. The net interest and dividends arising from the fund shall be distributed

New (printed by the chapter as new language)

and managed as a perpetual financial resource for the sole purpose of apportioning money to the different school districts of the state. Management of the fund shall be designed to provide annual distributions while preserving the purchasing power of the fund over time and balancing the needs of current and future beneficiaries. Reasonable and necessary administrative costs associated with managing the fund or school trust lands may be paid from the fund in the manner prescribed by law. The distribution policy shall be prescribed by law and consistent with the aforementioned principles. Distributions from the fund shall be apportioned

Laws of Minnesota 2026, chapter 114, section 1, after the change

and continues, unchanged, “to the different school districts of the state in a manner prescribed by law.” The chapter prints the rest of section 8 without a change.

Laws of Minnesota 2026, chapter 114, section 2

(a) The proposed amendment must be submitted to the people at the 2026 state general election. The question submitted must be: The question the chapter prints there is the question shown above. (b) The title required under Minnesota Statutes, section 204D.15, subdivision 1, for the question submitted to the people under paragraph (a) shall be: "Increasing funding to school districts."

How an amendment is ratified (Minnesota Constitution, article IX, section 1; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/constitution/#article_9)

If a majority of all the electors voting at the election vote to ratify an amendment, it becomes a part of this constitution. (as published online by the Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes, retrieved October 6, 2026.)

What this page does not say

DistrictFacts does not say what the amendment would do, what it would mean for any school district, or how to vote.

Referendum revenue authorization (46 questions)

• Albany Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #745)
• Alexandria Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #206)
• Benson Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #777)
• Brainerd Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #181)
• Campbell-Tintah Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #852)
• Centennial Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #12)
• Columbia Heights Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #13)
• Dawson-Boyd Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #378)
• Dilworth-Glyndon-Felton — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2164)
• Duluth Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #709)
• Duluth Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #709)
• East Grand Forks Public Schools — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #595)
• Eden Valley-Watkins School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #463)
• Ely Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #696)
• Frazee-Vergas Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #23)
• Glencoe-Silver Lake School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2859)
• Grygla Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #447)
• Hayfield Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #203)
• Henning Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #545)
• Hutchinson Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #423)
• Jackson County Central School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2895)
• Kasson-Mantorville School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #204)
• Lake Crystal-Wellcome Memorial — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2071)
• Lake Park Audubon School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2889)
• Lake Park Audubon School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #2889)
• Lanesboro Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #229)
• Laporte Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #306)
• Litchfield Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #465)
• Lynd Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #415)
• New London-Spicer School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #345)
• North St. Paul-Maplewood Oakdale Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #622)
• Northland Community Schools — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #118)
• Ortonville Public Schools — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2903)
• Park Rapids Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #309)
• Pequot Lakes Public Schools — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #186)
• Perham-Dent Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #549)
• Pipestone Area School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2689)
• Prior Lake-Savage Area Schools — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #719)
• Randolph Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #195)
• Sebeka Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #820)
• Sibley East School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2310)
• St. Charles Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #858)
• St. Louis County School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2142)
• Underwood Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #550)
• Walker-Hackensack-Akeley School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #113)
• Walker-Hackensack-Akeley School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #113)

General obligation bonds (19 questions)

• Alden-Conger Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #242)
• Austin Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #492)
• Caledonia Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #299)
• Caledonia Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #299)
• Centennial Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #12)
• East Grand Forks Public Schools — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #595)
• East Grand Forks Public Schools — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 3 (ISD #595)
• GFW Public Schools — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #2365)
• Litchfield Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #465)
• Nevis Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #308)
• Nevis Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #308)
• Nevis Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 3 (ISD #308)
• New York Mills Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #553)
• New York Mills Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 3 (ISD #553)
• Robbinsdale Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #281)
• Robbinsdale Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #281)
• Robbinsdale Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 3 (ISD #281)
• United South Central School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2134)
• West Central Area — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2342)

Capital project levy (12 questions)

• Alden-Conger Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #242)
• Campbell-Tintah Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #852)
• GFW Public Schools — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #2365)
• Inver Grove Heights Schools — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #199)
• Kimball Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #739)
• Maple Lake Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #881)
• Prior Lake-Savage Area Schools — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #719)
• Rocori Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #750)
• Sauk Centre Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #743)
• St. Louis County School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #2142)
• West St. Paul-Mendota Heights-Eagan — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #197)
• Winona Area Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #861)

General obligation bonds and a capital project levy in one question (5 questions)

• Elk River Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #728)
• Fosston Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #601)
• New York Mills Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #553)
• Ortonville Public Schools — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 2 (ISD #2903)
• Red Wing Public School District — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #256)

Other school district questions (1 question)

• Herman-Norcross Community School — SCHOOL DISTRICT QUESTION 1 (ISD #264)

Official source

• Minnesota Secretary of State ballot-question list

Explore Minnesota

• District directory
• Schools
• Compare districts

Browse

• Arizona school districts and agencies
• Connecticut school districts and agencies
• Delaware school districts and agencies
• District of Columbia school districts and agencies
• Florida school districts and agencies
• Georgia school districts and agencies
• Illinois school districts and agencies
• Iowa school districts and agencies
• Kentucky school districts and agencies
• Maryland school districts and agencies
• Massachusetts school districts and agencies
• Michigan school districts and agencies
• Minnesota school districts and agencies
• Nevada school districts and agencies
• New Hampshire school districts and agencies
• New Jersey school districts and agencies
• New York school districts and agencies
• Ohio school districts and agencies
• Pennsylvania school districts and agencies
• Rhode Island school districts and agencies
• Texas school districts and agencies
• Vermont school districts and agencies
• Virginia school districts and agencies
• West Virginia school districts and agencies
• Wisconsin school districts and agencies
• New York school taxes
• Education on Long Island
• New York public schools
• New York charter schools
• New York private schools
• Special-education placement schools
• Course planning by district
• New York educator & administrator payroll
• School budget leaderboards
• Compare districts
• DistrictFacts Data Desk
• Reporting tools by jurisdiction
• Methodology
• What data we have, state by state
• Open data
• Comparative district research packages
• K-12 voted bond capital pipeline